Showing posts with label SERPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SERPS. Show all posts

Friday, 22 April 2016

Google Reveals its Three Most Important Ranking Signals

We’ve already heard that RankBrain, Google’s artificial intelligence system, is the “third most important signal contributing to the result of a search query” and it seems like we may have confirmation on the top two factors as well.
During a live Q&A from WebPromo with Andrey Lipattsev, the Search Quality Senior Strategist at Google Ireland, SEO expert Ammon Johns suggested to Lipattsev that, knowing what we know about RankBrain, it would surely be beneficial to everyone if we also knew what the other two signals were.
And surprisingly, Andrey Lipattsev, obliges…
“It’s content and links pointing to your site.”
There you go.
I think what’s most surprising about this reply is Lipattsev’s candour. It’s a straight answer with little hesitation, that has an air of “look, you know this already” about it. And to be honest, we did. It’s just nice to have the confirmation.
Ammon Johns follows up with, “In that order?” To which Liplattsev replies, “There is no order.”
And although we believed RankBrain to be the third most important signal, Liplattsev reveals that this position is in fact “hotly contested.”
As Liplattsev warns himself, you should take the following with a pinch of salt…
“If you look at a slew of search results and open up the debugger to see what has come into play to bring about these results, certain things pop-up more or less often. Certain elements of the algorithm come into play for fewer or more cases… If you do that, you may see elements of RankBrain having been involved.”
HOWEVER!!!
“It’s not like having three links is ‘X important’ and having five keywords is ‘Y important’, and RankBrain is some ‘Z factor’ that is also somehow important, and if you multiply it all together [you’ll understand how your page is ranked] it’s not how it works.”
Google is trying to get better at understanding natural language and the meanings behind search queries, it’s still very early days for its machine learning algorithms.
Lipattsev also states that although it’s difficult for Google to claim that ’typed queries’ on mobile and desktop are subsiding voice search is certainly becoming more and more important. Google is also expecting this to bring about more stop words and mechanical language from users, because we still overthink our queries.
Before typing a query we often ask ourselves, “What is a query that is completely non-human in nature that sounds like what the machine will understand.”
It’s probably time we stopped doing this and let the machine learning algorithms get used to the way we actually use language.
Ultimately Google wants to support the people who have just started using the internet, those whose first experience is probably on a mobile, who haven’t developed this unnatural approach to search in the way that we have.
For Google, that’s the future of search.
So at the moment, yes it’s links and content that are keeping your webpages at the top of the SERPs, but with machine learning quickly developing and figuring out the best way to serve results as relevantly and naturally as possible, surely it won’t be long before intent is everything.
Check out the full one-hour long video below. It’s a fascinating watch and also features Rand Fishkin from Moz, Eric Enge from Stone Temple Consulting and Bill Slawski from Go Fish. The key information regarding ranking signals is at the 30 minute mark…



To view the original article Click Here

Thursday, 11 February 2016

The History of Google’s Biggest Changes over Time [INFOGRAPHIC]

The History of Google’s Biggest Changes over Time












The biggest change in search marketers’ lives is  arguably how search has morphed and is becoming more and more integrated into our daily routines. While Google innovates, we find ourselves harder to keep up.
For example, do you remember Yahoo and MSN were the alternate competitors to Google? Then, MSN (amongst many rebrands) became Bing all to leave Yahoo in the dust start taking back some search share. Or do you remember how searches were about “things” vs. “strings”? For example, we used to type “lumber utah” to find firewood for sale in Sandy, Utah. Now we ask Google “Where can I find lumber for sale for my fireplace near Sandy, Utah?” Voice search has aided the morphology of that.
Today, what we say and ask Google starts to matter less and less. Google tries to understand us before we even ask. It’ll morph or results based on our location, device we’re using, previous behavior, and more. It’s truly an engine of matching intent vs. matching keywords these days. And, of course, that’s changed how SEOs work.
Watching those keyword rankings go up and down are no longer as meaningful as they once where.  Below, my company MWI highlighted some of the most common theme changes over time.
Let us know in the comments if you know of any others.
old vs new google
To view the original article Click Here

Sunday, 31 January 2016

How The Search Engines Rank Content in the Search Results

As users have shifted to mobile devices, the limited screen size of the devices have pushed search engines to squeeze out & displace publishers with their own self-hosted information in an effort to offset the poor usability offered by tiny devices, while ensuring the search habit does not decline.
The philosophy of modern search has thus moved away from starting with information and connecting it to an audience, to starting with the user and customizing the result page to them.
"The biggest three challenges for us still will be mobile, mobile, mobile" - Google's Amit Singhal
How Search Works in 2016.
To view the original article Click Here